Great video and testimony. Thank you for coming forth.
There have been years of good testimonies that a healthier society based on greater trust among its peoples should have considered in earnest a long time ago, even without much physical evidence. And there has been scant or non universally conclusive physical evidence. Besides, more interesting physical or social evidence is usually attached to a form of plausible deniability or alternative explanation which may be socially efective but bogus. This sotuation may represent the existence of similar attitudes between the UAP intelligences (not revealing themselves unequivocally) and those military humans privy to direct knowledge of the existence of UAP intelligences; both coinciding in not revealing this presence too soon and/or unequivocally. Is it a collusion, an agreement or simply the mutual reinforcement of different purposes? The UAP intelligences not wanting to overturn their multiple plans by forcing to reveal themselves too much too soon and the "humans in the know" not wanting to overturn society ot to alert adversaries? Why is this situation changing today and how much can it be revealed?
¨ls confirm on 1:42 of video a strange ligthning strike when they are driving
Good ole gumshoe detective work. I'd guess we get about 4%. Expendable human experiments never go down so well with the public.
We've assembled some interesting testimony on UFOs.